6 research outputs found

    Empirical data of the baseline salience measurement and data fitted by the accumulator salience model.

    No full text
    <p>Left panel: five salience levels of orientation targets. Right panel: five salience levels of luminance targets. Symbols depict RT quantiles of each condition as follows: o = .1, Δ = .3, + = .5, × = .7, and ◊ = .9. Lines represent RTs generated by the model. Fitted RTs differ from empirical RTs by 5 ms on average (range: 0 to 28 ms). Additional parameter estimates were <i>T</i><sub>er</sub> = 300 ms, <i>s</i><sub>er</sub> = 70 ms, a = .08, and β = .294.</p

    Experimental design and stimuli.

    No full text
    <p>(a) A search display, consisting of 39 broken grey bars arranged around three imaginary concentric circles, was presented in the center of the screen, on a black background. There was always an orientation target; and in half of the trials (randomly determined), there was also a luminance distractor. Each trial started with a white fixation spot that was hidden while the display was presented until response. Inter-stimulus-intervals varied randomly in the range 900±200 ms. While ignoring a bright distractor, participants searched for a tilted target bar and decided, via a speeded button press, whether the gap was located at the top or the bottom of the bar. This response decision required focal attention to be allocated to the target. (b) 25 Salience difference conditions resulted from 5 orientation (7, 8, 9, 14, 45°) and 5 luminance (13.8, 14.8, 17.9, 19.4, and 25.5 cd/m<sup>2</sup>) contrasts.</p

    Course of BIC dependent on the inflection point of the regression function.

    No full text
    <p>Regression functions were fitted according to formula (1), with the inflection point as fixed parameter. Inflection points are specified in ms of salience difference.</p

    Capture of the eye by less salient distractors.

    No full text
    <p>Empirical proportion of capture by the distractor, averaged across participants, represents the proportion of first eye movements landing on the distractor position. Salience difference, averaged across participants, was derived from detection times in the baseline salience measurement requiring a simple target-present vs. target-absent decision (see <i>Methods</i> of <i>Behavioral eye-tracking experiment</i>). Negative x-values indicate distractors less salient than the target. Dots represent mean values of proportion of capture for each salience difference condition (<i>n</i> = 2); arrows indicate the associated standard errors.</p

    Behavioral interference and modeled proportion of capture as a function of salience difference.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Empirical RT interference, averaged across participants, represents the RT difference, in ms, between distractor-present and distractor-absent trials. Salience difference, averaged across participants, was derived from detection times in the baseline salience measurement requiring a simple target-present vs. target-absent decision (see <i>Methods</i> of <i>Behavioral reaction time experiment</i>). Negative x-values indicate distractors less salient, and positive x-values distractors more salient than the target. Dots represent mean values of RT interference for each salience difference condition (<i>n</i> = 25); arrows indicate the associated standard errors. Red dots indicate significant RT interference by distractors significantly less salient than the target (t-tests: <i>p</i><.05). Solid curve: regression function curve <i>R<sub>2</sub></i>. (b) Proportion of capture in the distraction experiment was predicted by salience difference, derived from fitting empirical salience difference values. Again, dots represent mean values of RT interference for each salience difference condition (<i>n</i> = 25). The curve depicts the nonlinear relationship according to <i>R</i><sub>2</sub>.</p

    Parameter estimates of the model predictions fitted to empirical and modeled data.

    No full text
    <p><i>Note: n</i> = 25. Estimate for empirical data in ms; asymptote estimate for modelled data in proportions. <i>R</i><sub>i</sub> = Nonlinear regression function. <i>S.E.</i> = Standard Error. <i>t</i> and <i>p</i> = value and probability of the t statistic associated with parameter estimate. Degrees of freedom: R<sub>1</sub>: 23, R<sub>2</sub>: 22. <i>CI</i> = 95% confidence interval. <i>BIC</i> = Bayes Information Criterion.</p
    corecore